Power storage has been a major topic of discussion within energy industry circles, particularly in connection with renewable energy, as technological advances appear poised to bring with them a new level of innovation.

Affordable storage would allow for more renewable power sources on the grid, create a path for customers to leave the grid, and even allow for new innovations around dynamic loads in energy.  

The inconvenient truth is that until recently, energy storage didn’t have any financial justification. The idea of value was there, but there was no actual value to create. Rooftop solar power systems create energy and can offset demand from other sources. The best energy storage systems can do is move demand from one hour of the day to another, but doing that was so expensive, it didn’t make financial sense. 

What’s changed recently is that utilities are starting to put rate structures in place that will make energy storage more economically viable. Ironically, their moves — designed to reduce the appeal of solar — are providing the impetus for innovation in the energy storage industry.

Where storage is hitting the grid today: The initial uses of energy storage systems have been primarily in commercial buildings and utility applications. A commercial building can use storage to reduce demand charge-fees based on the peak consumption in a building every month. Utilities are running pilot programs and even using stored power to patch holes in the grid, as Southern California Edison did earlier this year when it couldn’t provide enough peak power to customers after the Aliso Canyon natural gas leak. Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) swooped in and quickly built an 80 MWh energy storage system to fill the gap. 

These are important applications, but they’re also just the tip of the iceberg. As costs fall and technology improves, we’ll see energy storage play a bigger role across the countries. GTM Research estimates that 260 MW of energy storage will be built in the U.S. in 2016, but that figure will jump to 478 MW in 2017 and 2,045 MW by 2021.

What the future of storage looks like: The economics of energy storage start to make sense as the price of batteries come down. And that’s when we’ll see greater adoption. In residential solar, customers will be able to use storage systems to consume more of the energy generated directly from their rooftop systems, rather than selling it back to utilities. This was the intention of Tesla’s Powerwall, and with San Diego Gas & Electric and Pacific Gas & Electric; two of the largest utilities in California.

They are transitioning from traditional net metering to the time of use rates. In Net Metering 2.0; there will be more value to be extracted from good storage systems. Sunrun (NASDAQ: RUN) and SunPower (NASDAQ: SPWR) are also bringing their own storage solutions to homeowners, so look for the adoption of residential energy storage to grow tremendously in 2017. Commercial energy storage will continue to be driven by demand-charge reductions, but we could see more energy storage systems installed for self-consumption as well. 

The segment to watch in 2017 is really utility scale storage. We will likely see large batteries distributed throughout the grid, capable of relieving pressure on the grid locally. We also expect that energy storage will begin being included in renewable energy bids in the future.

The large concentration of solar in California has already led to a power consumption pattern that has been dubbed the duck curve: The demand on the grid drops off during day, followed by a large increase as the sun goes down (taking solar out of the equation) so when most people get home from work, energy storage systems built in conjunction with renewable energy plants can help make the duck curve less dramatic for the grid. 

EnergyNews
Leave a reply